Thursday, May 7, 2009

Clayton Homes

Clayton Homes has a pretty intriguing modular home right now. It purports to be a great green option, with energy-saving features in the basic model and add-ons for the "deep green" set. It's begging the green living crew to put its money where its mouth is. The house comes in two packages: the $74,900, 723-square-foot i-house I, and the $93,300, 1,023-square-foot i-house II. Both homes can be configured in at least seven different ways and come with a number of standard features, including galvanized metal roofing, corrugated steel siding, a butterfly roof with rainwater collection, and non-VOC paints.
Following the lead about just about every other company in the world, where introducing a product is of paramount importance, Clayton Homes this week introduced its ihouse (or ihome), which it says is at least 30% more energy- efficient than a traditional home. Clayton Homes is the largest manufacturer of modular homes in the U.S., and officially introduced its ihome at Berkshire Hathaway's recent annual shareholder meeting. The new offering features all the amenities required to reduce your carbon footprint (some optional).
There are two versions of the ihome: the 723-square-foot i-house I, ($74,900) and the 1,023-square-foot i-house II $93,300). As they are modular (meaning mobile, right?) both can be configured in many different ways. While the words "mobile home" have been used in a somewhat derogatory manner in the past, these Clayton Homes ihomes are certainly as far removed from what you might remember from an old movie as an iPod is from a reel-to-reel tape recorder. They come with a number of standard features, including galvanized metal roofing, corrugated steel siding, a butterfly roof with rainwater collection, and non-VOC paints.

IHouse

IHouse goes for $100 to $130 a square foot, depending on extras in what’s billed as “a moderately-priced plug and play dwelling” for the eco-conscious. The ribbon was cut on the iHouse in the US a few days ago at the annual shareholders’ meeting of investor Warren Buffett’s Berkshire-Hathaway Inc. in Omaha, Neb.
There are two versions of the ihome: the 723-square-foot i-house I, ($74,900) and the 1,023-square-foot i-house II $93,300). As they are modular (meaning mobile, right?) both can be configured in many different ways. While the words "mobile home" have been used in a somewhat derogatory manner in the past, these Clayton Homes ihomes are certainly as far removed from what you might remember from an old movie as an iPod is from a reel-to-reel tape recorder. They come with a number of standard features, including galvanized metal roofing, corrugated steel siding, a butterfly roof with rainwater collection, and non-VOC paints.
The greenness, I hate to say, of the Clayton homes ihome appears to come from the many options, such as solar panels, tankless water heaters, and low-flow faucets. Speaking of the iPod, I'm surprised the name of the Clayton Homes' offering is ihouse (or ihome) rather than ehouse, say. Apple is fiercely defensive of its iPod and will sue over what it considers anything that will possibly harm the image or cause confusion. At any rate, these new Clayton Homes iHouse offer a federal rebate for first time buyers, so pricing and the rebate make it something to be looked at.

Carrie Prejean Racy

Carrie Prejean Racy might exist has stunned California's state pageant officials. Prejean, the center of controversy ever since expressing her anti-gay marriage sentiments at the Miss USA pageant last month, apparently told pageant officials that only one provocative photo existed - the one first posted at TheDirty.com earlier this week. But on Wednesday, pageant officials learned that at least three other racy pics exist.
TMZ reported that Prejean sent an e-mail to Keith Lewis, co-director for the Miss California USA pageant, saying, "This was when I was 17 years old. I was a minor. It was when I was first getting into the modeling world, being naive, and young. I shouldnt (sic) have taken the photo of me in my underwear. There are no other photos of me. This was the only one I took." "I'm absolutely stunned. This completely changes things for us," Lewis said in a statement to "Access Hollywood."
"Yesterday, we thought she had explained things accurately. We need to revisit this issue with her." Prejean signed a contract stating she has never been photographed nude or partially nude and the Miss California USA Organization told "Access" they will meet with runner-up Miss Malibu Tami Farrell in the next few days, suggesting she may soon be taking over the title of Miss California from Prejean. Farrell told Billy Bush of "Access Hollywood" that she was ready to assume the tiara if need be.
Bookmark and Share